骗子假冒 imToken 市场部门人员联系非小号，将非小号中的 imToken 下载地址篡改为骗子网站，imToken 安全团队发现后已第一时间联系非小号进行修正。
Sorry to hear that. it's important to state that imToken will not custody your belongings; you might be thoroughly chargeable for the security of your respective property.
为了保障用户资产安全、打造优质加密生态，imToken 致力于普及安全资讯并提供解决方案。
terrible expertise, as tricky and as high-priced to use as you can. Will uninstall as soon I am able to take away my tokens. I do not understand why they've built it so difficult to take out tokens off application scammy.
近来，随着数字货币的火爆，市场上涌现了大量假冒的数字货币钱包。这些假钱包外观上与正版几乎无异，但其内在却暗藏木马程序，一旦用户将资产转入这些假钱包，便会被黑客窃取，给用户造成了难以估量的损失。尤其是知名的imToken钱包，由于其用户基数庞大，成为了假冒者的主要目标。
为匹配用户属地国家的监管政策，imToken 已限制中国境内用户访问和使用部分功能???? 了解详情
● 支持通过一套助记词在单个钱包内添加不同网络上的账户，和在同一网络上派生多个独立账户
In relation to owning an ordinary brimming with a wallet, imtoken has it throughout all services, I'm taking pleasure in these. retain strengthening.
为匹配用户属地国家的监管政策，imToken 已限制中国境内用户访问和使用部分功能???? 了解详情
The courts have ruled that the short-term nature of Liquor in the blood causes it to be unreasonable to require a warrant for a compelled blood attract. Opponents believe that a compelled blood attract is surely an invasion of privacy and a violation of the proper in opposition to self-incrimination.
Suppressing an poor pressured blood attract is integral to your combat for constitutional legal rights. A skilled California DUI defense lawyer will evaluate a forced blood draw to determine regardless of whether a driver's legal rights are already violated. If the right protocols weren't adopted, the lawyer will shift for the evidence for being excluded.
抱歉在使用 imToken 时给你造成了疑惑，如果你是确认从正规渠道下载的 imToken ，那么可以无视风险提示继续安装使用。这些风险提示一般是部分地区（如中国大陆）的部分手机厂商、系统的提示，属于误报。imToken 正在努力解决这些不可控因素，致力于给用户带来良好的使用体验。再次感谢你对我们的支持和反馈！
安全始于了解开发者如何收集和分享数据。数据隐私保护和安全措施可能会因您的使用情况、所在地区和用户年龄而异。此类信息由开发者提供，可能会随时间更新。
protection begins with being familiar with how developers collect and share your data. Data privateness and stability techniques may possibly change determined by your use, location, and age. The get more info developer delivered this info and may update it after a while.
pressured blood attracts are permitted under the 1966 U.S. Supreme court docket case of Schmerber v. California. The court ruled that police normally takes a driver's blood without having a warrant in an effort to conduct a chemical check.